Re: syslog by default?
От | Tatsuo Ishii |
---|---|
Тема | Re: syslog by default? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010912095950W.t-ishii@sra.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: syslog by default? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: syslog by default?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Tatsuo Ishii writes: > > > There was a discussion about --enable-syslog by default. What was the > > consensus? I think this is a good one. > > It would be a good one if we make the blind assumption that syslog() > exists on all platforms. That is possible, but not guaranteed. (BeOS, > QNX, Cygwin?) > > The alternative suggestion to turn it off if syslog() is not found makes > me wary. These schemes have invariably lead to problems in the past. > Recall libpq++ being missed because of false test results, readline > support mysteriously disappearing and nobody noticing until Mandrake had > shipped their CDs. There are possible scenarios where syslog support > could be missed by configure, such as when you need some compat or bsd > library. Why are you so worrying about finding syslog() in configure? We have already done lots of function testings. Is there anything special with syslog()? -- Tatsuo Ishii
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: