Re: What Is The Firing Order?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What Is The Firing Order? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200109071736.f87HabN26715@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What Is The Firing Order? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: What Is The Firing Order?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> > I think that'd probably work, although I think that you probably > > want to ensure that deferred constraint triggers run after normal > > triggers and immediate constraints when you're running statements > > in their own implicit transactions, since that would model the > > behavior (check on commit) better. > > Yes, the semantics of immediate and deferred triggers wouldn't change. > I'm just suggesting that when the system has a choice of legal firing > orders, it adopt an "alphabetical order" rule. AFAICS, all it would > take to implement this is for RelationBuildTriggers to sort the list > of triggers just after it's read them from pg_trigger and before it > inserts them into the TriggerDesc structure (ie, about line 638 of > trigger.c in current sources). The latter insertion is where they > are divided into categories, so the sorting would end up only affecting > the ordering within categories. > > The interesting question is not that, really, but whether an > alphabetical-ordering rule will be useful and convenient. I don't > recall exactly how the system chooses names for triggers that it creates > --- if the user can't control those at all then this idea may not be > helpful. Should we get a system where the user can control the firing, perhaps using oid order? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: