Re: template0 and template1 databases
От | Andrew Gould |
---|---|
Тема | Re: template0 and template1 databases |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010906201346.86161.qmail@web13403.mail.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: template0 and template1 databases (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Thanks, Tom! The only things I've done to the template* databases (intentionally) was vacuumdb and \d to template1. Andrew --- Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Andrew Gould <andrewgould@yahoo.com> writes: > > Okay, so I don't need to pg_dump the template* > > databases; and I should not dropdb them. > > template0 shouldn't need to be dumped, since it's > always supposed to be > virgin initdb data. template1 may need to be dumped > if you have any > site-local additions in it. pg_dumpall gets these > considerations right. > > As for dropping, the system won't let you do it > unless you go in and > hand-hack pg_database's datistemplate flags. I have > actually tested > dropping template1 and recreating it from template0, > which I suppose > someone might want to do if they mess up template1 > badly enough. > If you drop template0, you no longer have a > guaranteed virgin database > to use as a reference, but perhaps that doesn't > bother you. > > > My scripts aren't anything to brag about; but I > think > > newbies (such as myself) may find them useful. > Who > > reviews contributions for /contrib? > > Send 'em to pgsql-patches, I guess. > > regards, tom lane __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: