Re: PL/java?
От | Dr. Evil |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PL/java? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010826041744.11860.qmail@sidereal.kz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: PL/java? ("Gowey, Geoffrey" <ggowey@rxhope.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> probably a bad idea. From what I've heard the speed of your java > program is wholely dependent on the speed of your vm (and most > aren't that quick). Although it would be nice to have just to say > we have it and mysql doesn't (then again mysql doesn't have a whole > lot of things that pgsql already has). PG has no competition from MySQL. MySQL finally got a procedural language, but it's perl! perl is in many ways a terrible PL. Basically, if you are using a database for any kind of real stuff where data integrity and reliability are important, you need a strongly-typed language. PL/pgsql is actually a greal language for this. Far better than perl. Anyway... yeah, I have heard that a lot of java vms are not fast, but a lot of the time fast isn't as important as solid and correct, and java lends itself to solid, correct programming better than most other languages.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: