Re: Permissions for large-object comments
От | Shane Wegner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Permissions for large-object comments |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010824174818.A14087@cm.nu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Permissions for large-object comments (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 02:45:40AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Tom Lane writes: > > > Shane Wegner <shane@cm.nu> writes: > > > test=> \lo_unlink 89803 > > > ERROR: pg_description: Permission denied. > > > > Hmm. Maybe those client-side comment manipulations in psql aren't > > such a hot idea. I know I never tested them as non-superuser :-( > > :-( > > > Shane, try that from a superuser Postgres userid. Meanwhile, > > it's back to the drawing board for us. > > I'm not sure about the future of the large objects, so I'm less eager to > invent a new mechanism. I'm open to ideas, however. Well as I'm not a developer, this it out of my league. However, if the future of large objects is in question, is there a better way I should be storing large chunks of binary data in the database. The text column doesn't seem to support it. Regards, Shane -- Shane Wegner: shane@cm.nu http://www.cm.nu/~shane/ PGP: 1024D/FFE3035D A0ED DAC4 77EC D674 5487 5B5C 4F89 9A4E FFE3 035D
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: