Re: User locks code
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: User locks code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200108232255.f7NMtO814879@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: User locks code ("Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > > If the licence becomes a problem I can easily change it, > > > but I prefer the GPL if possible. > > > > We just wanted to make sure the backend changes were not > > under the GPL. > > No, Bruce - backend part of code is useless without interface > functions and I wonder doesn't GPL-ed interface implementation > prevent using of user-locks in *commercial* applications. > For example, one could use user-locks for processing incoming > orders by multiple operators: > select * from orders where user_lock(orders.oid) = 1 LIMIT 1 > - so each operator would lock one order for processing and > operators wouldn't block each other. So, could such > application be commercial with current licence of > user_lock()? (Sorry, I'm not licence guru.) I assume any code that uses contrib/userlock has to be GPL'ed, meaning it can be used for commercial purposes but can't be sold as binary-only, and actually can't be sold for much because you have to make the code available for near-zero cost. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: