Re: SELECT FOR UPDATE
От | will trillich |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SELECT FOR UPDATE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010823033012.H15403@serensoft.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SELECT FOR UPDATE (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 09:01:10PM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote: > jose wrote: > > - Is it possible to know in advance if the records of a given query are > > locked, to prevent to be locked for ever? > Anyway, the answer is no. Standard SQL doesn't have any > mechanism to check wether a given row is locked or to force a > query to fail with an error in the case a required lock isn't > available immediately. > > But the question itself tells that you're about to implement > a major design error in your application. Holding database > locks during user interaction IS A BAD THING. Never, never > ever do it that way. And anybody telling you something > different is an overpaid idiot. "never ever do it THAT way." okay. what way SHOULD we do it? -- Khan said that revenge is a dish best served cold. I think sometimes it's best served hot, chunky, and foaming. - P.J.Lee ('79-'80) will@serensoft.com http://sourceforge.net/projects/newbiedoc -- we need your brain! http://www.dontUthink.com/ -- your brain needs us!
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: