RE: clustering and/or failover?
От | Jim Buttafuoco |
---|---|
Тема | RE: clustering and/or failover? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200108211401.KAA32624@server1.spectrumtelecorp.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | clustering and/or failover? ("Robert J. Sanford, Jr." <rsanford@nolimitsystems.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
http://linux-ha.org/ look for heartbeat. > what software are you running for this? where can i find it? > > thanks! > > rjsjr > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org > > [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Jim > > Buttafuoco > > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 6:53 AM > > To: Robert J. Sanford, Jr.; pgsql-general@postgresql.org > > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] clustering and/or failover? > > > > > > Robert, > > > > I have been running a "heartbeat" PG database cluster for > > a year now using a shared SCSI bus. Yes the heartbeat > > software has to be careful about when to mount the disk > > and on what system. But this seems to work well (I did > > a lot of testing before putting into production.) This > > is a pure master/standby cluster config. > > > > Jim > > > > > > > thinking in the long-term for my project... > > > > > > i'm looking at trying to set up two database servers with > > > some sort of clustering and/or failover that are talking > > > to a SAN. is this even feasible using postgres? > > > > > > using ms sql server as an example (because that is what > > > my office is currently using) you can set up two database > > > servers that will check each other's heartbeat to see if > > > they are both up. if one goes down then the other takes > > > over responding to requests. you can also set up a > > > cluster that will have both machines responding to > > > requests concurrently. > > > > > > with the data set up on a fibre channel raid box you > > > don't have to worry about replication, you just have to > > > make sure that the data is properly locked by each of > > > the servers (in the clustering example) so that no two > > > machines are updating the same data at the same time. > > > > > > i am fairly certain that postgres cannot handle the > > > first example (heartbeats) but am wondering if it can > > > handle the second example where two instances are > > > hitting the same physical data store. > > > > > > many thanks! > > > > > > rjsjr > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of > > broadcast)--------------------------- > > > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the > > unregister command > > > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to > > majordomo@postgresql.org) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of > > broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html > > > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: