Re: Float Percision with MS Access 97
От | Michael Calabrese |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Float Percision with MS Access 97 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010820220305.23234.qmail@web10704.mail.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Float Percision with MS Access 97 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
RE: Float Precision with MS Access 97
|
Список | pgsql-odbc |
I am sorry, but I guess I did not make my question clear. I am not looking for greater backend precision (ie moving to float8). There seems to be a mis-comunication between Access and postgres with float4. Access is seeing the number with fewer digits than want must be in postgres. If I do a : UPDATE Parts SET Count = round(Count,4); Then the access query from my first email will work. This is a pain right now because my users will get a write conflict error, call me, I will find the offending field, do and Update with the round(x,4), then it will work. I could fix it by putting round(x,4) with all float fields, but this seems like a poor fix. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: