Re: Guide to PostgreSQL source tree
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Guide to PostgreSQL source tree |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200108201529.f7KFTYZ08428@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Guide to PostgreSQL source tree (Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Hi all, > > For a few months now I've been thinking about whether or not a guide > ('line-by-line') to the Postgres source tree would be of any value. > > Such a guide would, most probably, trace an 'ultimate' query (ie, > one which requires the use of all source level functionality) through the > source as well as reference appendices guides to underlying functionality > (backend lib, transactions, macros) and client interfaces (inc. FE/BE > protocol, internals of the libs etc), procedural language interfaces, SPI > and any other part of the source I have left out. I wonder if we should just work down from where we are now. We have the FAQ, backend flowchard, and "PostgreSQL Internals through Pictures" that I wrote, plus a presentation by Tom Lane. Where do we go from there? > Secondly, where Postgres really out performs proprietary databases is in > its source being open. Problems which cause major functionality problems > and downtime in critical vendor installations could often easily be > resolved if developers had the source. I think a thorough source guide > would go some way to bolstering the appeal of Postgres to such developers > whilst countering some of the arguments for throwing hefty sums of money > at support. I didn't realize that was happening. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: