Re: Cygwin test for current libpq sources?
От | Jason Tishler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Cygwin test for current libpq sources? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010816144820.B2152@dothill.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
PostgreSQL CVS does not compile under Cygwin (was Re: Cygwin test ...)
Re: Cygwin test for current libpq sources? |
Список | pgsql-cygwin |
Tom, On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 06:16:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I've just finished (I think) cleanup after the recent libpq patches to > make it work better on Win32. It is alleged that nonblocking mode works > now on Win32. I am wondering if things are working or broken on Cygwin, > however. When you get some time, would you pull CVS tip and try it out? I just built the latest PostgreSQL CVS and ran it against essentially the latest Cygwin CVS. make check failed with many connection refused false positives. Previously, I would only get these occasionally. Recall that Windows NT 4.0 Workstation and 2000 Professional only have a backlog size of 5. Can the above mentioned changes be the cause of the increased connection refused failures? Additionally, I had (test) misc failures, but I believe that is due to the other failures? Is that assessment correct? Since the parallel schedule was failing, I decided to try the serial one. With the serial schedule, all tests passed except for random. Normally, I wouldn't worry, but random failed every time I ran either version of the regression test except for once. Does this indicate a problem? So, I think that Cygwin PostgreSQL is OK, but I'm not completely sure... Is there anything else that you would like me to try? Thanks, Jason
В списке pgsql-cygwin по дате отправления: