Re: Re: Use int8 for int4/int2 aggregate accumulators?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Use int8 for int4/int2 aggregate accumulators? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200108141601.f7EG1BG07870@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: Use int8 for int4/int2 aggregate accumulators? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > >> create function rtest_viewfunc1(int4) returns int4 as > >> 'select count(*) from rtest_view2 where a = $1' > >> language 'sql'; > >> + ERROR: return type mismatch in function: declared to return integer, returns bigint > > > Maybe instead of testing for strict equality of the types, test for > > compatibility. > > We could try to force-convert the result of an SQL function to the right > thing, I suppose, but I'm worried that that might mask programmer errors > more than it helps. > > On the other hand, the equivalent forced conversion happens already in > plpgsql functions; it's only SQL-language functions that are so picky. > Maybe your idea is good. Anyone else have an opinion? I don't know. Doing a force for SQL functions and not for others seems kind of confusing. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: