Re: PL/pgSQL bug?

Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <JanWieck@yahoo.com> writes:
> >> that plpgsql's handling of command-counter changes is broken, but it
> >> does not follow that sprinkling the code with SetQuerySnapshot is wise.
>
> >     Why  do  you  blame  PL/pgSQL  for that? I don't see a single
> >     reference to the command counter from the  PL/pgSQL  sources.
> >     All it does is using SPI. So does "using SPI" by itself count
> >     as "boken"?
>
> Sorry: SPI is broken, not plpgsql.  Does that make you feel better?
   Not  that  it  "makes  my  day". But it makes me feel better,   thanks.


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #



_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com