RE: pg_connect vs. pg_pconnect
От | Brent R. Matzelle |
---|---|
Тема | RE: pg_connect vs. pg_pconnect |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010809134919.9991.qmail@web13008.mail.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: pg_connect vs. pg_pconnect ("Hunter, Ray" <rhunter@enterasys.com>) |
Список | pgsql-php |
--- "Hunter, Ray" <rhunter@enterasys.com> wrote: > Chris, > > I am including the php source that has the pg_pconnect and the > problems. On > one php page, I am query the database multilple times to get > specific data > in order to populate a table for our engineers. > > I have to use it on the create_sub_table function. > > I have no idea why it does not work. I personally never mix connection types as I always use pg_pconnect() for every connection call. I consistently get one PostgreSQL process for each Apache process. Your code opens up a new PostgreSQL connection for each function call, except for create_sub_table(). As a result, you can have many idle database processes for each httpd process. You can count on each non-pg_pconnect() connection to linger for a minute or so and that will eat all your system resources with only a few simultaneous users. Brent __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
В списке pgsql-php по дате отправления: