Re: Re: Name for new VACUUM
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Name for new VACUUM |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200108031615.f73GFBU04116@jupiter.us.greatbridge.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Name for new VACUUM (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: Name for new VACUUM
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > > > VACUUM DEFRAG? > > VACUUM COMPRESS? > > While these look kinda ugly to me, I can find no stronger objection than > that. (Well, maybe I could complain that these overstate what old-style > vacuum actually does, but that's even weaker.) What do other people > think? What I think? That this entire discussion wasted far too much time already. These commands live usually in crontabs and aren't typed in that often. So give the baby "a name" and done. VACUUM CLASSIC and VACUUM LIGHT or whatever. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com # _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: