Re: Clear out the reminants of EXTEND INDEX

> > diff -u -r1.91 nodes.h
> > --- src/include/nodes/nodes.h    2001/06/19 22:39:12    1.91
> > +++ src/include/nodes/nodes.h    2001/07/16 09:35:35
> > @@ -158,7 +158,6 @@
> >      T_DropStmt,
> >      T_TruncateStmt,
> >      T_CommentStmt,
> > -    T_ExtendStmt,
> >      T_FetchStmt,
> >      T_IndexStmt,
> >      T_ProcedureStmt,
>
> This is not good --- we try to avoid renumbering existing node types.
> (Not for any essential reason, perhaps, but why risk breaking anything?)
> My practice when removing a node type is to change the nodes.h entry
> like this:
>
>     T_RemoveOperStmt,
>     T_RemoveStmt_XXX,            /* not used anymore; tag# available */
>     T_RenameStmt,
>
> Adding the _XXX is sufficient to ensure that any missed uses of the
> typecode in the source will yield compile errors.
>
> Otherwise it looks OK.

I always rip that stuff out. We do an initdb for every release.  What
could break by renumbering those nodes?

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026