Re: Re: [PATCH] To remove EXTEND INDEX
| От | Martijn van Oosterhout |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Re: [PATCH] To remove EXTEND INDEX |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20010714103628.B11863@svana.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Re: [PATCH] To remove EXTEND INDEX (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 06:34:22PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Let's drop the meta-discussions and cut to the chase: given that we are > > about to re-enable partial indexes, should we try to make EXTEND INDEX > > work too, or just remove it? > > We don't let people add columns to an existing index so I don't see why > we should have EXTEND INDEX unless index twiddling is more common with > partial indexes. We don't allow people currently to fiddle with indices at all. I don't understand the origin of EXTEND INDEX since I can't think of a situation where it would actually be useful. -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > It would be nice if someone came up with a certification system that > actually separated those who can barely regurgitate what they crammed over > the last few weeks from those who command secret ninja networking powers.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: