Re: Re: [PATCH] To remove EXTEND INDEX

> * I agree with Tom's assertion that it's an awful lot of complexity for such
> a marginal gain. Look at the size of the patch and the fact that it has all
> been useless for the last few years.
> 
> * I didn't send it to -patches because it's not ready yet.
> 
> * Only posted a URL, not the patch itself. Sorry for the confusion.
> 
> Tom actually suggested doing this at the same time as re-enabling partial
> indices but I favoured a separate patch considering the large number of
> scattered changes.
> 
> Anyway, is there a concensus, or shall I forget the whole thing?

I vote for removing the feature.  Removing stuff of doubtful usefulness
is a big gain.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026