Re: Set priority for requests
От | Martijn van Oosterhout |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Set priority for requests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010711111750.B1824@svana.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Set priority for requests (Laurent HERVE <laurent_herve@infonie.fr>) |
Ответы |
Re: Set priority for requests
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 11:10:56PM +0200, Laurent HERVE wrote: > Actually it seems impossible to set priorities to backends. But in a real > database, which runs 24h / day, you might have to run batch programs that, for > example, reads database to extract some data, but in parallel, you still have > transactions which must be performed with good performance. Can we imagine > that, in the future, it will be possible to set priority to backends allowing > batch programs to run without giving penalty to interactive transactions ? I'm not sure if I'm on the right track but this question comes up in various places to do with locking and priorities. If something is holding a lock but has a really low priority then other processes with a higher priority may get jammed. This may not be a problem with Postgres's not-really-locking model, but things are not as easy as they sound. -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > It would be nice if someone came up with a certification system that > actually separated those who can barely regurgitate what they crammed over > the last few weeks from those who command secret ninja networking powers.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: