Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code)
От
Bruce Momjian
Тема
Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code)
Дата
Msg-id
200107110059.f6B0xgV23763@candle.pha.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: SOMAXCONN (was Re: Solaris source code) (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Solaris source code Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Solaris source code Mathijs Brands <mathijs@ilse.nl>
Re: Solaris source code Naomi Walker <nwalker@eldocomp.com>
Re: Solaris source code ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
Re: Solaris source code Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: Solaris source code Mathijs Brands <mathijs@ilse.nl>
> ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers) writes: > > All the OSes we know of fold it to 128, currently. We can jump it > > to 10240 now, or later when there are 20GHz CPUs. > > > If you want to make it more complicated, it would be more useful to > > be able to set the value lower for runtime environments where PG is > > competing for OS resources with another daemon that deserves higher > > priority. > > Hmm, good point. Does anyone have a feeling for the amount of kernel > resources that are actually sucked up by an accept-queue entry? If 128 > is the customary limit, is it actually worth worrying about whether > we are setting it to 128 vs. something smaller? All I can say is keep in mind that Solaris uses SVr4 streams, which are quite a bit heavier than the BSD-based sockets. I don't know any numbers. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления