Re: AW: pg_index.indislossy
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AW: pg_index.indislossy |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200107101456.f6AEu1A07420@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: AW: pg_index.indislossy (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian writes: > > > > > > > Can someone tell me what we use indislossy for? > > > > > > Ok, so the interpretation of this field is: > > > A match in the index needs to be reevaluated in the heap tuple data, > > > since a match in the index does not necessarily mean, that the heap tuple > > > matches. > > > If the heap tuple data matches, the index must always match. > > AFAIK, this is true for all indexes in PostgreSQL, because index rows > don't store the transactions status. Of course those are two different > underlying reasons why a heap lookup is always necessary, but there > shouldn't be any functional difference in the current implementation. Seems it is something they added for the index abstraction and not for practical use by PostgreSQL. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: