Re: AW: pg_index.indislossy
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AW: pg_index.indislossy |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200107091835.f69IZnx08978@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | AW: pg_index.indislossy (Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: AW: pg_index.indislossy
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Added to pg_index.h file as a comment. > > > > > Can someone tell me what we use indislossy for? > > Ok, so the interpretation of this field is: > A match in the index needs to be reevaluated in the heap tuple data, > since a match in the index does not necessarily mean, that the heap tuple > matches. > If the heap tuple data matches, the index must always match. > > A very typical example for such an index is a hash index. This might explain the > fact, that the ODBC driver misinterpreted that field as meaning that the index is a hash. > The field has nothing to do with partial index. > > Andreas > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: