Re: Vacuum and Transactions
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Vacuum and Transactions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200107061849.f66Inbw09583@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Vacuum and Transactions ("Trewern, Ben" <Ben.Trewern@mowlem.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Vacuum and Transactions
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > >> In 7.2, VACUUM will not require an exclusive lock. > > > Care to elaborate on that? How are you going to do it? > > Uh, have you not been paying attention to pg-hackers for the > last two months? > > I am assuming here that concurrent VACUUM will become the default > kind of vacuum, and the old style will be invoked by some other > syntax (VACUUM FULL ..., maybe). By concurrent vacuum, do you mean the auto-vacuum you are doing? I realize that will not need a lock. Are you changing default VACUUM so it only moves rows inside existing blocks too? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: