Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200106262317.f5QNHLh03898@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian writes: > > > The only reason to add double-crypt is so we can continue to use > > /etc/passwd entries on systems that use crypt() in /etc/passwd. > > On the sites that are most likely to utilize that (because they have a lot > of users) it won't work (because they use NIS). There are better ways to > do that (e.g., PAM). > > Also, see http://httpd.apache.org/docs/misc/FAQ.html#passwdauth Thanks. That was a nice description. Seems no one is worried about losing /etc/passwd capability so I will not worry about doing double-crypt and concentrate on md5. I just didn't want to remove functionality before warning people. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: