Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200106261633.f5QGXqM16901@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords (teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > > > > > For the same reason I don't see any value in the idea of adding > > > > > crypt-based double encryption to clients. We don't really want to > > > > > support that over the long run, so why put effort into it? > > > > > > > > The only reason to add double-crypt is so we can continue to use > > > > /etc/passwd entries on systems that use crypt() in /etc/passwd. > > > > > > Haven't many systems (at least Linux and FreeBSD) switched from this > > > to other algorithms as default, like MD5? (and usually found in /etc/shadow) > > > > Yes, most BSD's are MD5. I wasn't sure about Linux. > > Most recent (3-4 years and newer) use PAM, which can use MD5 as an > underlying module. But what is the default? crypt or md5? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: