Re: Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords

> In the long run, though, we want to drop crypt(3) usage entirely.
> It's just too much of a pain in the neck to depend on the C library's
> crypt(), for two reasons:
> 
> 1. It's not in libc on all systems, leading to constant problems when
> linking clients, particularly with shared libraries that have to have
> a dependency on another shared library because of this.  (Search the
> archives for problems about "can't find crypt".  There are many such
> reports.)
> 
> 2. crypt() isn't guaranteed compatible across platforms, meaning that
> your clients may be unable to log in anyway.  See for example
> http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=57516
> 
> Using our own MD5 (or whatever) code will avoid these problems.

Agreed.  If people say they want to keep crypt for /etc/passwd, we can. 
If they don't say they want it, we can go with only MD5.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026