Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200106260456.f5Q4u4Y00723@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords (Jim Mercer <jim@reptiles.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 12:20:40AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > We will do double-crypt and everyone will be happy, right? > > > > > if the API as above existed, then i would be happy to see "password" go away > > > (although it should be depreciated to a --enable option, otherwise you are > > > going to ruin a bunch of existing code). > > > > Who is using it? We can continue to allow it but at some point there is > > no purpose to it unless you have clients that are pre-7.2. Double-crypt > > removes the use for it, no? > > if the API allows a plain text password, and compares agains a cyrtpo-pg_shadow > i would imagine that would be fine. > > at this point i should apologize for possibly arguing out of turn. > > if 7.2 has the above, that is cool. > > i'm sorta hoping my mods can make it into 7.1.3, if there is one. Not a chance. Only major bug fixes in 7.1.X. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: