Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200106260417.f5Q4H4u28496@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords (Jim Mercer <jim@reptiles.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Encrypting pg_shadow passwords
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > The wire is clearly less secure than pg_shadow. > > ah, you've not had a client rooted lately. I think most people would disagree. > the wire is far more secure than many default OS installations. Maybe time for a new OS. We run on some pretty secure OS's. > i will not argue that the double-encryption stuff, and MD5 type stuff is > better. > > however, forcing the dbadmin to store plain-text passwords in pg_shadow > is at best unwise. > > giving them the option of my mods is a reasonable step towards allowing > them to avoid that one-stop-shopping facility for crackers, without breaking > any existing implementations for those who chose to walk what i consider > an unsafe path. The big problem is that when we make a change we have to also talk to old clients to you would have a pretty complex setup to have 'password' encryption passing the same crypt over the wire all the time. If not, why not use 'crypt' authentication. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: