Re: Re: Does PostgreSQL support EXISTS?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Does PostgreSQL support EXISTS? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200106131509.f5DF99V08176@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: Does PostgreSQL support EXISTS? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: Does PostgreSQL support EXISTS?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > I thought NOT IN was the only one that was concerned about any NULL? > > No, they both are: in the presence of NULLs, IN can return TRUE or NULL, > NOT IN can return FALSE or NULL. > > The reason the FAQ is always about NOT NULL is that WHERE treats NULL as > FALSE, so the average newbie writing an IN doesn't even realize he's > getting a NULL rather than a FALSE. With NOT NULL, he can't ignore it. Got it. How does an IN subquery returning NULL behave differently from one returning FALSE? I can't think of a test that would be affected. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: