Re: Apparent deadlock for simultaneous sequential scans
От | bruc@stone.congenomics.com (Robert E. Bruccoleri) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Apparent deadlock for simultaneous sequential scans |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200106081332.JAA70934@stone.congenomics.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Apparent deadlock for simultaneous sequential scans (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Apparent deadlock for simultaneous sequential scans
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Dear Tom, > > > pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org writes: > > Apparent deadlock for simultaneous sequential scans > > > However, if more than one application is run at once, the performance > > deteriotates drastically. > > So is it a deadlock, or a slowdown? How many is "more than one"? With two processors running the same query, it appears to be a slowdown. When I look at the system calls, the backends were executing about one read per second. With six processors running the same query, it appeared to be a deadlock -- no I/O's were being issued over the time that I watched. "More than one" means two or more. Thanks. --Bob +----------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Robert E. Bruccoleri, Ph.D. | Phone: 609 737 6383 | | President, Congenomics, Inc. | Fax: 609 737 7528 | | 114 W Franklin Ave, Suite K1,4,5 | email: bruc@acm.org | | P.O. Box 314 | URL: http://www.congen.com/~bruc | | Pennington, NJ 08534 | | +----------------------------------+------------------------------------+
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: