return value of a version-1 C function (Solved)
От | Francesco Casadei |
---|---|
Тема | return value of a version-1 C function (Solved) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010605154025.A410@goku.kasby обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: return value of a version-1 C function (Solved)
|
Список | pgsql-general |
[This message refers to my previous post '[GENERAL] return value of a version-1 C function'] Ooops, I didn't read the docs very carefully! I solved the problem, by declaring cod as a proper structure and then returning it with PG_RETURN_BPCHAR_P(cod): BpChar *cod = (BpChar *)SPI_palloc(VARHDRSZ + 8); char c[9]; ... /* c = generated code (8 chars) + '\0' */ ... cod->vl_len = VARHDRSZ + 8; memmove(VARDATA(cod), c, 8); PG_RETURN_BPCHAR_P(cod); } Now I have three more questions! 1) SPI_connect() and SPI_finish() mark a new memory context; since I must return cod I need to SPI_palloc() it in the upper Executor context. The problem is: how can I free the SPI_palloc()'ed memory? I can't SPI_pfree() it before PG_RETURN_BPCHAR_P(cod), conversely nothing after PG_RETURN_BPCHAR_P(cod) would be executed. As stated in section 22.3 of the PostgreSQL Programmer's Guide 'SPI has no ability to automatically free allocations in the upper Executor context!', hence the question: how do I cope with this situation? 2) If I use the VARSIZE(__PTR) macro (defined in postgres.h) to set the size of cod, the compiler will complain about an invalid lvalue. This is not valid: VARSIZE(cod) = VARHDRSZ + 8; Can I safely use: cod->vl_len = VARHDRSZ + 8; or is this incorrect? 3) The following variable is an identifier (Name): Name tablename = PG_GETARG_NAME(0); If I want to retrieve the string contained in the union pointed to by tablename I should use the macro NameStr(name) defined in c.h: (void)strlcat(query, NameStr(fieldname), sizeof(query)); but again the compiler will complain with the error "request for member `data' in something not a structure or union". Name is a pointer to NameData union: typedef union nameData { char data[NAMEDATALEN]; int alignmentDummy; } NameData; typedef NameData *Name; NameStr is defined as: #define NameStr(name) ((name).data) but name is a pointer, so shouldn't NameStr be defined as: #define NameStr(name) ((name)->data) ? Is it correct to use: tablename->data? I attached the C code of the function. I'm not a C/PostgreSQL guru, so ANY suggestion is welcome. Thanks in advance for your help. Francesco Casadei
Вложения
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: