Re: template1, can there be a template2/3/4?
От | Jim Mercer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: template1, can there be a template2/3/4? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010604151224.E9538@reptiles.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: template1, can there be a template2/3/4? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: template1, can there be a template2/3/4?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 02:16:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: > > Jim Mercer <jim@reptiles.org> writes: > >> where are these relations? is this a compile-time thing, or can it be done > >> on-the-fly? > > > Compile-time; see SharedSystemRelationNames in > > backend/utils/init/globals.c. You'd have to do an initdb after changing > > it, anyway. > > BTW, the reason that pg_shadow is installation-wide is that it's > not real clear what the 'ownership' column in pg_database means > if users are not installation-wide. Before cutting and hacking, > you'd need to think carefully about just what semantics you are > really after. theoretically, if i nuked everything from SharedSystemRelationNames, then each database would be wholly stand-alone, and the remaining code should just work? -- [ Jim Mercer jim@reptiles.org +1 416 410-5633 ] [ Now with more and longer words for your reading enjoyment. ]
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: