Re: template1, can there be a template2/3/4?
От | Jim Mercer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: template1, can there be a template2/3/4? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010604122010.X9538@reptiles.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: template1, can there be a template2/3/4? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: template1, can there be a template2/3/4?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 12:13:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > it would be a method for getting around the fact that a user in template1 > > has access to all of the other databases, modulo per-database permissions > > via GRANT/REVOKE > > Which database you are connected to has nothing whatever to do with > whether you can see/manipulate other databases. template1 is certainly > not special in that regard. The only reason createdb and friends > connect to template1 is that it's the only DB name they can be pretty > certain exists. ah, so users/groups are not stored in template1, but in some other series of physical files. hmmm. yep, that certainly does squash my idea. i imagine it would be architectually difficult to have seperate user/group tables per database. -- [ Jim Mercer jim@reptiles.org +1 416 410-5633 ] [ Now with more and longer words for your reading enjoyment. ]
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: