Re: AW: AW: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AW: AW: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200105302016.f4UKGOr21471@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | AW: AW: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem (Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I have relucantly added this UNDO/VACUUM thread to TODO.detail. People can review the discussion via a link on the TODO page or in CVS. Whenever we resolve this issue, I will gladly remove these emails. > > > > > > So are whole pages stored in rollback segments or just > > > > > the modified data? > > > > > > > > This is implementation dependent. Storing whole pages is > > > > much easy to do, but obviously it's better to store just > > > > modified data. > > > > > > I am not sure it is necessarily better. Seems to be a tradeoff here. > > > pros of whole pages: > > > a possible merge with physical log (for first > > > modification of a page after checkpoint > > > there would be no overhead compared to current > > > since it is already written now) > > > > Using WAL as RS data storage is questionable. > > No, I meant the other way around. Move the physical log pages away from WAL > files to the "rollback segment" (imho "snapshot area" would be a better name) > > > > in a clever implementation a page already in the > > > "rollback segment" might satisfy the > > > modification of another row on that page, and > > > thus would not need any additional io. > > > > This would be possible only if there was no commit (same SCN) > > between two modifications. > > I don't think someone else's commit matters unless it touches the same page. > In that case a reader would possibly need to chain back to an older version > inside the snapshot area, and then it gets complicated even in the whole page > case. A good concept could probably involve both whole page and change > only, and let the optimizer decide what to do. > > > But, aren't we too deep on overwriting smgr (O-smgr) implementation? > > Yes, but some understanding of the possibilities needs to be sorted out > to allow good decicsions, no ? > > Andreas > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: