Re: Re: OpenOffice compile
| От | Jim Mercer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Re: OpenOffice compile |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20010528121253.T9538@reptiles.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Re: OpenOffice compile (teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:08:06AM -0400, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: > > IMHO, basing an open project on 7.6M lines of code that can only > > compiled on four or five different architectures > > That many? OpenOffice hardly compiles anywhere, and it needs an > _exact_ version of the compiler as it tries to do it's own exception > handling. Very strange. i beleive that Mozilla suffered from a similar fate when released by Netscape. while i don't know alot of people using Mozilla directly, i am aware of a number of offshoot applications that are using the base source code. i would agree that source-suites with 10 million lines of code are rather un-wieldy. however, i fully support the efforts of any group that tries to make it a more sane thing. OpenOffice/StarOffice/whatever would be a wonderful boon to the OSS movement. it would be nice if the database engine behind it was a full fledge SQL system like postgres. -- [ Jim Mercer jim@reptiles.org +1 416 410-5633 ] [ Now with more and longer words for your reading enjoyment. ]
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: