Re: pg_index.isclustered can work
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_index.isclustered can work |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200105151354.f4FDsd701285@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_index.isclustered can work (Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
[ Charset US-ASCII unsupported, converting... ] > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > [snip] > > > > > FYI, the reference to pg_index.indisclustered in ODBC was assuming it > > meant it was a hash index, > > Hmm where could I see it ? > > > which is just plain wrong, so that code is > > not coming back. > > It is in info.c, SQLStatistics(): /* * Clustered index? I think non-clustered should be type * OTHER not HASHED */ set_tuplefield_int2(&row->tuple[6], (Int2) (atoi(isclustered) ? SQL_INDEX_CLUSTERED: SQL_INDEX_OTHER)); The HASH mention has me confused. Is that code valid? Maybe so. What does ODBC think the column means, HASH or CLUSTER? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: