Re: Removal of pg_variable, pg_inheritproc, pg_ipl

> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> Why did you remove indisclustered?
> >>
> >> Useless it may be, but gratuitously breaking at least two extant clients
> >> doesn't seem like a good idea ...
>
> > I patched the clients also.  Is that a problem?
>
> Yes.  People frequently try to use clients that aren't the same rev
> as the server.  There's no good reason to remove this column at all,
> and creating a version incompatibility for two major clients seems like
> sufficient reason not to.
>
> I recommend reverting that change.

Doing it now, but just to the system catalogs.  No reason to keep the
backend code.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026