Re: pg_index.indislossy
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_index.indislossy |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200105150002.f4F02At24143@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_index.indislossy (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Should I remove this column? > > NO. The fact that we don't currently have any lossy index types doesn't > mean that we won't ever have them again. I've been wondering, for > example, whether the frequently heard requests for case-insensitive > indexes might not be answerable by implementing 'em as lossy indexes. I see it now. It is just looking for a flag in the index creation: if (!strcasecmp(param->defname, "islossy")) That is the extent of the lossy code. There is optimizer code checking for it. Seems an ifdef NOT_USED around those would document what needs to be done, and document it doesn't do anything now, or I can just leave it alone. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: