Re: pg_index.indislossy
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_index.indislossy |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200105142325.f4ENPNZ22216@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_index.indislossy (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_index.indislossy
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > > I think that at least the GIST intarray (actually intset) methods use > > > it. > > > > > > So you probably should _not_ remove it ;) > > > > I did a search and found it used only a few places. I do not see it > > used as part of GIST. My rememberance is that it is involved in partial > > indexes, where you index only certain values in a column. It was an old > > idea that was never working in PostgreSQL. > > Let's avoid removing things for the sake of removing them ... might be an > old idea that, if someone takes the time to research, might prove useful > ... Yea, there is actually some code attached to this vs. the others that had no code at all. Are we ever going to do partial indexes? I guess that is the question. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: