Re: Coping with huge deferred-trigger lists

Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com> writes:
> >     The  detail  I'm wondering about most is how you'd know in an
> >     UPDATE case which two tuples (one deleted  during  this  XACT
> >     and  one inserted) are the two for OLD and NEW in the call to
> >     the trigger.
>
> Ugh ... good point.  There's no back-link from the updated tuple to
> its original on disk, is there?
   AFAIK nothing other than the Oid. And that's IMHO a weak one.


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #



_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com