Re: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Isn't pg_statistic a security hole?
Дата
Msg-id 200105072336.f47NaD511077@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Isn't pg_statistic a security hole?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Sounds fine, but aren't most people who we ask for stats superusers?
> 
> Are they?  I don't think we should assume that.

OK, just asking.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: System catalog representation of access privileges
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: CVS branch management (was Re: A problem with new pg_dump)