Re: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems
От | Michael Samuel |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010504235022.B4596@miknet.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems (mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 08:02:17AM -0400, mlw wrote: > The way I understand it is that ReiserFS does not attempt to separate files at > the block level. Multiple files can live in the same disk block. This is cool > if you have many small files, but the extra overhead for large files such as > those used by a database, is a bit much. It should be at least as fast as other filesystems for large files. I suspect that it would be faster in fact. The only catch is that the performance of reiserfs sucks when it gets past 85% or so full. (ext2 has similar problems) You can read about all this stuff at http://www.namesys.com/ > I really think a simple low down dirty file system is just what the doctor > ordered for postgres. Traditional BSD FFS or Solaris UFS is probably the best bet for postgres. > Remember, general purpose file systems must do for files what Postgres is > already doing for records. You will always have extra work. I am seriously > thinking of trying a FAT32 as pg_xlog. I wonder if it will improve performance, > or if there is just something fundamentally stupid about FAT32 that will make > it worse? Well, for a starters, file permissions... Ext2 would kick arse over FAT32 for performance. -- Michael Samuel <michael@miknet.net>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: