Re: Collation order for btree-indexable datatypes
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Collation order for btree-indexable datatypes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200105022319.f42NJ4m24592@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Collation order for btree-indexable datatypes (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Collation order for btree-indexable datatypes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> A closely related problem is that the "current time" special value > supported by several of the date/time datatypes is inherently not > compatible with being indexed, since its sort order relative to > ordinary time values keeps changing. We had discussed removing this > special case, and I think agreed to do so, but it hasn't happened yet. > > What I'm inclined to do is force consistency of the comparison operators > now (for 7.1.1) and then remove "current time" for 7.2, but perhaps it'd > be better to leave the whole can of worms alone until 7.2. Comments > anyone? Comparing NaN/Invalid seems so off the beaten path that we would just wait for 7.2. That and no one has reported a problem with it so far. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: