Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200105022136.f42Lajl01886@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | New Linux xfs/reiser file systems (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: New Linux xfs/reiser file systems
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> The "problem" with log based filesystems is that they most likely > do not know the consequences of a write so an fsync on a file may > require double writing to both the log and the "real" portion of > the disk. They can also exhibit the problem that an fsync may > cause all pending writes to require scheduling unless the log is > constructed on the fly rather than incrementally. Yes, this double-writing is a problem. Suppose you have your WAL on a separate drive. You can fsync() WAL with zero head movement. With a log based file system, you need two head movements, so you have gone from zero movements to two. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: