Re: JDBC Pooling driver
От | Ned Wolpert |
---|---|
Тема | Re: JDBC Pooling driver |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200104302019.f3UKJb338041@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | JDBC Pooling driver (Ned Wolpert <ned.wolpert@knowledgenet.com>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Don't mean to reply to my own message... but... Just an additional thought. Instead of creating a new pooling technique in PostgreSQL jdbc driver, could we do a specialized select that would return the 'getInsertedOid()' instead? (Select $_gett_inserted_oid) Does that make sense to others? (Kinda like what oracle's and other jdbc driver do.) > Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 14:00:32 -0400 (EDT) > From: Ned Wolpert <ned.wolpert@knowledgenet.com> > Folks- > > Got a question about using the PostgreSQL JDBC driver with pooling. > Using 7.1, I noticed the extra functionality with the JDBC driver, > like getInsertedOid(). I love it, since it helps with sequence > numbers an integration with Castor. However, since the PostgreSQL > JDBC driver doesn't have pooling connections as an option, I use > PoolMan (or other) to pool connections. When I do this, I no longer > have access to these PostgreSQL specific features. > > Is there any plans for adding this functionality into the JDBC > driver? Is this something that others are looking for? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Public key at http://www.keyserver.net iD8DBQE67cjuiysnOdCML0URAmWgAJ46xLa1Qt3g38JatXfPhfZ4kdDvxwCfeu3b i41kITdbIWdkLXk/8ldZ5Vg= =/S4b -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: