Re: On the _need_ to vacuum...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От geustace@godzone.net.nz
Тема Re: On the _need_ to vacuum...
Дата
Msg-id 20010429043342.B59791B4DE@agree-6.godzone.net.nz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на On the _need_ to vacuum...  (Jack Bates <postgres@floatingdoghead.net>)
Ответы Re: Re: On the _need_ to vacuum...  (Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>)
Re: Re: On the _need_ to vacuum...  (Mike Castle <dalgoda@ix.netcom.com>)
Re: Re: On the _need_ to vacuum...  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
I am rather staggered by a developer considering it necessary to
attempt to cooerce the core development team into including a patch.

If the work that Alfred has done is as effective as he claims, then
there must be a *REALLY* good reason why it isn't being included.

I don't want to start any form of war....
But as a user I'd be interested to know why such a patch would appear
to be unacceptable.

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Glen Eustace,
GodZone Internet Services, a division of AGRE Enterprises Ltd.,
P.O. Box 8020, Palmerston North, New Zealand 5301
Ph/Fax: +64 6 357 8168, Mob: +64 21 424 015



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Meeks
Дата:
Сообщение: Joining more than 2 tables
Следующее
От: Jeff Waugh
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: crypt(table.field) ?