Re: ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix
От | Michael Meskes |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010405104003.A15090@feivel.credativ.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | AW: ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix (Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:01:53AM +0200, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote: > I do agree with the statement, that HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64 shoud be > defined on all platforms where the compiler understands it to be 64bits. > It would imho be the responsibility of backend code, to only do one of > the two if both are defined. I just committed some changes so that ecpg does acceptt "long long" variables all the time, but repleces them with type "long" if HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64 is not defined. This appears to be a strategy similar to the one used by the backend. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael@Fam-Meskes.De Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: