Re: [PORTS] Re: patch for minor Win32 makefile bug
От | Jason Tishler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PORTS] Re: patch for minor Win32 makefile bug |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010404171455.A802@dothill.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PORTS] Re: patch for minor Win32 makefile bug (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Tom, Peter, On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 05:04:40PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > > It seems we're now down to > > > DLLLIBS= -lcygipc -lcrypt > > > but I think it can be removed completely. > > > We have three uses of this variable: > > > 1) Makefile.win, for building extension modules. No module in existance > > needs -lcygipc, and if one needs -lcrypt it can put it into SHLIB_LINK. > > > 2) Makefile.shlib, see 1) > > > 3) -lcrypt already comes in via LIBS (like all the other libraries), > > -lcygipc can do the same, or be hard-coded in place. > > > But you forgot about -lpostgres for the backend libraries (plpgsql etc). > > I suppose that we might consider adding these libraries to LIBS not > DLLLIBS, but that's cleanup work that I'd rather not try to do under > time pressure (especially since I can't test it here). Can we commit my updated patch for 7.1RC3? I promise to help clean up the above for RC4 or final. Is this acceptable? Thanks, Jason -- Jason Tishler Director, Software Engineering Phone: +1 (732) 264-8770 x235 Dot Hill Systems Corp. Fax: +1 (732) 264-8798 82 Bethany Road, Suite 7 Email: Jason.Tishler@dothill.com Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA WWW: http://www.dothill.com
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: