Re: Re: [PATCHES] patch for minor Win32 makefile bug
От | Jason Tishler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [PATCHES] patch for minor Win32 makefile bug |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010404152743.X63@dothill.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [PATCHES] patch for minor Win32 makefile bug (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [PATCHES] patch for minor Win32 makefile bug
|
Список | pgsql-ports |
Tom, On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:01:17PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Right, given that the other two need not be mentioned. What about > -L/usr/local/lib, did that make any sense to include or not? Hmm...I guess that my emails are too long so that you lose interest while reading them... :,) Anyway, see the following: On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 10:38:51PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 06:03:45PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > BTW, I see that the prior version of backend/Makefile actually defined > > DLLLIBS as > > > > DLLLIBS := -L/usr/local/lib -lcygipc -lcrypt -lcygwin -lkernel32 > > > > as compared to what Makefile.win offers (shorn of the backend): > > > > DLLLIBS=-lcygipc -lcygwin -lcrypt -lkernel32 > > > > Any comments on whether -L/usr/local/lib is appropriate here or not? > > We have already determined that the -L/usr/local/lib option is > superfluous for both the Cygwin Net and b20.1 releases. See the > following for details: > > http://www.postgresql.org/mhonarc/pgsql-ports/2001-03/msg00049.html > > How does this proposal sound? > > Works for me. Given that we'd like to package RC3 tonight, it'd be nice > to get this done ASAP. Do you have time to work up and test a patch > today, or shall I risk making untested changes myself? I'm doing a build right now. The patch should follow shortly. Jason -- Jason Tishler Director, Software Engineering Phone: +1 (732) 264-8770 x235 Dot Hill Systems Corp. Fax: +1 (732) 264-8798 82 Bethany Road, Suite 7 Email: Jason.Tishler@dothill.com Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA WWW: http://www.dothill.com
В списке pgsql-ports по дате отправления: