Re: Re: [PATCHES] patch for minor Win32 makefile bug
От | Jason Tishler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [PATCHES] patch for minor Win32 makefile bug |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010404142809.U63@dothill.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [PATCHES] patch for minor Win32 makefile bug (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [PATCHES] patch for minor Win32 makefile bug
|
Список | pgsql-ports |
Tom, On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 12:44:08AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com> writes: > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 06:03:45PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Hmm. It seems a little bit weird (no, a lot weird) to be referencing > >> -lpostgres for the client-side interface library builds. I can see that > >> the PL-language DLLs might need to reference -lpostgres during their > >> links, but I've got severe doubts that this is a good idea anyplace > >> else. > > > You are correct. I just verified by using MS's dumpbin that none > > of the above DLLs except for plpgsql.dll actually import any symbols > > from libpostgres.a. Hence, linking the client-side interface libraries > > with libpostgres.a is superfluous. > > However, you missed a few regression test related DLLs. See below for > > details. > > Good point; those DLLs link into the backend. > > Maybe Makefile.win should define FE_DLLLIBS (for frontend libraries) > and BE_DLLLIBS (for backend libraries). That would require any > particular Makefile that's building a DLL to select one or the other > to define DLLLIBS as, before it could include Makefile.shlib. Is that > approach good for clarity, or too much of a pain-in-the-neck? I'm not sure that I like the above proposal, because: 1. I'm not crazy about the name FE_DLLLIBS -- I don't think that it accurately represents its semantics. (I presume that you meant that FE_DLLLIBS = -lcygipc -lcrypt; otherwise, I'm not grokking your proposal.) 2. Then all DLL makefiles would have to define DLLLIBS, instead of just the exceptions. But, to be fair, I also don't completely like my current solution because of the -L$(top_builddir)/src/backend -lpostgres littered in more that one makefile. What about leaving DLLLIBS as defined (in Makefile.win) in my patch, but also defining BE_DLLLIBS as follows: BE_DLLLIBS = -L$(top_builddir)/src/backend -lpostgres Then one can use this definition is in src/pl/plpgsql/src/Makefile as follows: DLLLIBS:= $(BE_DLLLIBS) $(DLLLIBS) The above would also be used where ever else was necessary (e.g., regress.dll). How does this proposal sound? Thanks, Jason -- Jason Tishler Director, Software Engineering Phone: +1 (732) 264-8770 x235 Dot Hill Systems Corp. Fax: +1 (732) 264-8798 82 Bethany Road, Suite 7 Email: Jason.Tishler@dothill.com Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA WWW: http://www.dothill.com
В списке pgsql-ports по дате отправления: